Tag Archives: Jonathan Haidt

Are social psychologists biased against conservatives? A simple check for ideological bias.

Maria Konnikova has an article in the New Yorker on whether there is bias in social psychology against conservatives.  One of the people calling attention to the issue is Jonathan Haidt, whose work my long time readers will know I’m … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

The vast majority of us are not “Homo economicus”.

Often, when I write about moral instincts, people respond with assertions that we’re essentially selfish creatures and that nothing about morality is natural.  There’s a name for this concept of the solely self serving  human being, “Homo economicus.”  The Neuroskeptic discusses … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

American positions on moral issues and tensions between the moral foundations

Gallup did a poll on American positions on various moral issues, finding that Americans are now more accepting than ever on a range of issues. Most of these I don’t find particularly surprising.  Of course, it turns out that Democrats … Continue reading

Posted in Morality | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

The scope of objective facts and morality

Our recent discussions, particularly on the thread about Jonathan Haidt’s response to Sam Harris’s challenge, left me thinking about the various scopes of objective facts.  In retrospect, it’s a bit obvious to me now that a key question in moral … Continue reading

Posted in Morality, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 21 Comments

Why I think Sam Harris is wrong about morality | The Righteous Mind

Several commenters  have said I should not just critique the excessive certainty of the New Atheists. I should respond directly to Sam Harris’s Moral Landscape Challenge. I should say why I think the argument he makes about a science of … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 25 Comments

This View of Life: Why Sam Harris is Unlikely to Change his Mind

The New Atheist Sam Harris recently offered to pay $10,000 to anyone who can disprove his arguments about morality. Jonathan Haidt analyzes the nature of reasoning, and the ease with which reason becomes a servant of the passions. He bets … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , | 21 Comments

The foundations of morality

Last week, I made a post on the fact that we have desires, urges, impulses, motivations, that are inherently not rooted in reason or logic, that while reason and logic are extremely useful, they are tools of these desires, these … Continue reading

Posted in Morality, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

This View of Life: The Evolution of Fairness

Brosnan and de Waal’s finding of fairness in the capuchin monkey has settled the long-standing question of whether animals have a sense of fairness and further blurred the line between humans and other animals in a new territory: the sphere … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Why evangelicals and Catholic leaders are against contraception | Machines Like Us

Why do the leaders of some religious groups like the Catholics and now even evangelicals oppose contraception, to the extent of even objecting to health insurance policies covering it? After all, access to safe, reliable, and easy contraception has to … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Why science, philosophy, or religion cannot determine morality

There are some famous thinkers, Sam Harris and Michael Shermer, among others, who are currently attempting to sell the idea that we should have a “science of morality“.  They assert that moral propositions reduce to matters of fact about the … Continue reading

Posted in Morality, Philosophy, Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 31 Comments