Project Hanuman: information as the fundamental reality

Cover of Project Hanuman showing a nebula with 1s and 0s in the background and what appear to be Hindu letters.

Stewart Hotston acknowledges that his Project Hanuman is inspired by Iain Banks' Culture novels. The society he describes, known as the Archology, is very similar to the Culture in many respects. However, where Banks' books usually have the Culture as the dominant civilization technologically, and always have them coming out on top, Hotston's Archology finds … Continue reading Project Hanuman: information as the fundamental reality

The attitude of physicalism

Spurred by conversations a few weeks ago, I've been thinking about physicalism, the stance that everything is physical, that the physical facts fix all the facts. A long popular attack against this view has been to argue that it's incoherent, since we can't give a solid definition of what "physical" means. And so physicalism seems … Continue reading The attitude of physicalism

If usefulness isn’t a guide to what’s real, what is?

Seems like I've been writing a lot about quantum mechanics lately. Apparently so have a lot of other people. One thing that keeps coming up is the reality or non-reality of the quantum wave function. Raoni Arroyo and Jonas R. Becker Arenhart argue for non-reality: Quantum mechanics works, but it doesn't describe reality: Predictive power … Continue reading If usefulness isn’t a guide to what’s real, what is?

Biological computation and the nature of software

A new paper is been getting some attention. It makes the case for biological computation. (This is a link to a summary, but there's a link to the actual paper at the bottom of that article.) Characterizing the debate between computational functionalism and biological naturalism as camps that are hopelessly dug in, the authors propose … Continue reading Biological computation and the nature of software

Why I’m a reductionist

The SEP article on scientific reductionism notes that the etymology of the word "reduction" is "to bring back" something to something else. So in a methodological sense, reduction is bringing one theory or ontology back to a simpler or more fundamental theory or ontology. The Wikipedia entry on reductionism identifies different kinds: ontological, methodological, and … Continue reading Why I’m a reductionist