Tag Archives: Karl Popper

Massimo Pigliucci on the boundary between science and pseudoscience

In this video, Massimo Pigliucci, the philosopher and biologist who runs the Scientia Salon site, discusses the demarcation problem, the dividing line between what is and is not science.  The distinction is easy for things like astrology and astronomy, but … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Why philosophical conclusions are not reliable knowledge

Following Neil deGrasse Tyson’s wholesale dismissal of philosophy, there has been a lot of discussion on the value of philosophy.  As I’ve said repeatedly, I think philosophy has a great deal of value, but some of its defenders are tending to overstate … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 51 Comments

Falsifiability is useful, but a matter of judgment

Our discussions last week on Jim Baggott’s book, ‘Farewell to Reality’, and Sean Carroll’s Edge response, left me pondering falsifiability, the idea that theories should be falsifiable in order to be considered science. Falsifiability is a criteria identified by the … Continue reading

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Science, philosophy, and caution about what we think we know

What is the difference between science and philosophy?  While there are enterprises that are clearly in one or the other, the dividing line isn’t always a sharp one.  Science grew out of philosophy, particularly natural philosophy.  Some would say that … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 44 Comments