The Shattering Peace, and aliens who have consciousness as an augmentation

For people looking to dip their toe in the sci-fi literary genre, John Scalzi is often a good place to start. A lot of sci-fi literature assumes certain knowledge from the reader (such as what “burning at two gees” means). Scalzi’s fiction tends to only assume what you might pick up watching sci-fi TV shows or movies. And his introduction of concepts is usually fairly approachable.

His writing style also helps. Scalzi seems to take Elmore Leonard’s writing rules to heart, avoiding long descriptions, lengthy interior monologues, or other things that bog down the pacing, overall leaving out the parts that “readers tend to skip”. To read Scalzi is to experience story at a snappy pace with minimal effort. He often tells a story in three hundred pages where many contemporary authors seem to need five hundred. With the humor he usually laces in, it makes him a bestselling author.

I can’t say I like everything about his writing. Keeping things approachable means he doesn’t always follow the full implications of the ideas he raise, his endings can feel unearned, and some of his more recent books have gotten a bit too silly for my tastes.

But The Shattering Peace is a return to the Old Man’s War universe, his initial breakout space opera series. The first book in the series channels the spirit of Robert Heinlein’s Starship Troopers, but with the recruits being elderly and discovering their service involves having their minds transferred into new combat bodies. The implications of this get explored in the first few books of the series.

In the early books, the universe is portrayed as dog eat dog, with humanity having to hold its own against numerous alien species in unending competition for planets to colonize. As the series progresses (and I suspect as Scalzi’s own views evolve), we learn that things are not as they initially seem.

One thing I was happy to see acknowledged in this new book is that people would want the mind copying technology for civilian purposes, such as avoiding old age. Mind transfer happens in the military, apparently for decades, without having any apparent effects on the rest of the Colonial Union society, which has long felt dubious to me. The rationale presented is that most people didn’t know about it until recent changes, although with lots of ex-soldiers running around, and many others in government aware of the technology, that also seems dubious.

Anyway, by the beginning of this story, there’s been an uneasy peace agreement for several years, with a moratorium on new colonies by the stakeholders. However, in an effort to see if the various species can work together, a secret colony is established, called “Unity”, with a population of humans and several other species. When the colony disappears, Gretchen Trujillo finds herself volunteered for a mission to investigate. Before she leaves, she’s warned that the Consu, an advanced alien race, advanced far beyond everyone else, had been observed taking an interest in the solar system the colony was in.

She receives this warning from the Obin, who she has a special relationship with. The Obin are a species that were uplifted by the Consu. However, the Consu purposefully gave them intelligence without consciousness, apparently just as an experiment. Throughout their history, the Obin existed without consciousness. Then a Colonial Union scientist invented a wearable device that can provide a consciousness for them. Each of them can choose when to have their device on or off. Consciousness is a new thing for the Obin, and they are still learning how to cope with it, often turning it off when they need maximum alertness or productivity.

“Consciousness” here seems to imply a capacity for emotional feelings. With their device off, the Obin are portrayed as affectless, seemingly like philosophical vulcans, still able to think, communicate, and navigate their environment, but without emotions. Which means, by many definitions of consciousness, they still have a form of it with the device off, just without sentience in the classical sense. The Consu appear to have given them sapience without sentience. The reasons for this eventually become a plot point.

The Consu themselves are arrogant, with a philosophy that cherishes conflict as a virtue. To them, species can only approach “perfection” through violent conflict. They see the current peace between the various alien races as bad for the souls of those races. They live this philosophy, usually handicapping themselves in fights with other species to ensure a more equal contest, and engaging in ritualistic but violent conflict between their own factions.

All of which factor into the central conflict of this story.

As with the other Scalzi’s books, this one is entertaining. It’s a good adventure story. I enjoyed and recommend it.

That said, without getting into spoilers, I’m not wild about the ending. I found the resolution…unsatisfying. I might have been more onboard, but didn’t feel like the groundwork had been sufficiently laid, at least not enough for me. I wouldn’t avoid reading it for that reason since I still enjoyed the story, and you may well be fine with the ending.

Have you read it? Or any of the other Old Man’s War books? If so, what do you think about them? Or of the notion of “consciousness” Scalzi uses with the Obin?

8 thoughts on “The Shattering Peace, and aliens who have consciousness as an augmentation

  1. I will be reading this book … when the price comes down (I have an excuse for being cheap, I am a retire school teacher … and I am sticking to it). I skipped over this post as I wanted to avoid spoilers. I like Scalzi’s writing very much and thank you for the link to Elmore’s Rules (haven’t read it yet but I usually gobble up such things as I am an aspiring fiction writer).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m with you on the price. I pre-ordered it a long time ago and can’t remember what I paid. But the current list price is obnoxious. It’s not as bad as Asher’s newest books, but it’s getting there.

      I usually avoid spoilers in these posts, and make it clear upfront when I don’t. But usually the first act, the first 20-25% of the novel, is considered fair game, and sometimes some details from later strictly about the setting. But if you plan to eventually read it anyway, I can understand not taking the risk.

      Like

  2. @selfawarepatterns.com Him saying he doesn't write the stuff readers skip should be said exactly as it is: "I don't research, I don't have complex deep dives, I don't look into or extrapolate, and I don't understand most technical or scientific research, so I don't use any of that in my scifi writing. I assume you're just as shallow as I am and write a lot of fart joke type scifi."

    Peirs Anthony was the same with scifi fantasy.

    Like

    1. With the “leave out the part that readers tend to skip” remark, I was actually channeling Elmore Leonard’s tenth rule (which I linked to), not anything I’ve seen Scalzi say. If you like all that detail, good for you. There are plenty of authors who’ll give it to you. But most of the time, I don’t. To me, if often feels like self indulgence on the part of the author.

      Like

  3. I’ve read the first six books in Scalzi’s OMW series, and while I enjoyed the first two, and the third was okay, the rest were disappointing.

    Scalzi has an online persona that is at odds with his face-to-face, at least it has been when I’ve talked to him, where he freely admitted his online presence is performative.

    He’s a person who feels the need to argue with those whose opinions oppose his that is fine up to a point, but it has put me off all his books since Redshirts, which so disappointing that I got rid of my copy. YMMV on that.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I follow Scalzi and a number of other authors online, but I try to keep their online personas separate in my mind from their fiction, which I know takes effort. In a few cases, I’ve stopped following them online so I can continue to enjoy their fiction.

      There are authors who make their fiction a thinly disguised sociopolitical argument. But I’m rarely attracted to that kind of fiction anyway, even when I agree with the message. Of course, the author’s views are always going to bleed through, but if it’s a good story and isn’t rubbing our face in those views, it’s easier to ignore.

      In Scalzi’s case, I do agree that the early OMW books have been the best so far.

      Like

  4. I hadn’t thought about it before, but I think you’re right. Scalzi is more approachable than other Sci-Fi writers. I’m going to keep that in mind for whenever someone asks me for a good reading recommendation.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to SelfAwarePatterns Cancel reply