Tag Archives: Massimo Pigliucci

Stephen West and Massimo Pigliucci discuss David Hume

Stephen West, on his Philosophize This! podcast, interviews Massimo Pigliucci on David Hume.  This was a big win for me.  Two of my favorite podcasters discussing one of my favorite historical philosophers!  It provides some good insights into Hume’s skeptical … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Massimo Pigliucci’s pessimistic view of mind uploading

Massimo Pigliucci wrote a paper on his skepticism of the possibility of mind uploading, the idea that our minds are information which it might be possible someday to copy into a computer virtual reality system or some other type of technology. … Continue reading

Posted in Mind and AI | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 21 Comments

Massimo Pigliucci on the boundary between science and pseudoscience

In this video, Massimo Pigliucci, the philosopher and biologist who runs the Scientia Salon site, discusses the demarcation problem, the dividing line between what is and is not science.  The distinction is easy for things like astrology and astronomy, but … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Is logic and mathematics part of science?

Last week was scientism week at Scientia Salon, and I reblogged a post by Coel Hellier on a defense of scientism, mostly by arguing that mathematics was actually part of science.  As I indicated in my comment on that reblog, … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The dualism of mind uploading

A few days ago, when I told him I thought his skepticism of mind uploading was a bit overly pessimistic, Massimo Pigliucci pointed out that mind uploading implies dualism and seemed to see this as a strike against it.  (The … Continue reading

Posted in Mind and AI | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 47 Comments

My philosophy, so far — part II | Scientia Salon

Massimo Pigliucci is doing an interesting series of posts on his philosophical positions. In the first part [19] of this ambitious (and inevitably, insufficient) essay I sought to write down and briefly defend a number of fundamental positions that characterize … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 36 Comments

What Scientific Arrogance Really Looks Like — Starts With A Bang! — Medium

Ethan Siegel weighs in on the Tyson / philosophy controversy.  Siegel is a theoretical physicist, notably a cosmologist which I believe is Tyson’s own specialty.  But Siegel’s views on philosophy appear to be much more informed. Now, philosophy doesn’t have … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Neil deGrasse Tyson is wrong to dismiss all of philosophy, but he may have a point on some of it

So, I reblogged Massimo Pigliucci’s post responding to Tyson’s remarks about philosophy, which appears to have generated some heated discussion.  After reading some of it, I realized that I have a few thoughts on this. First, I suspect Tyson’s blanket dismissal of philosophy … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | 54 Comments

Philosophy that ignores science risks impotence

Peter Hankins has a post up reviewing Harold Langsam’s new book, ‘The Wonder of Consciousness‘.  While the book sounds interesting (Hankins describes it as philosophically dense, so I probably won’t read it), something bothered me while reading Hankins’s review. It … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Do we all do science?

Massimo Pigluici has a cartoon response up on Rationally Speaking in reply to Sam Harris’ Edge response.  Harris thinks that science is defined too narrowly, is suspicious of talk of the limits of science, and sees the distinction between science, … Continue reading

Posted in Zeitgeist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments