What Astronomy Says About Religion | Seth Shostak

WMAP image of the (extremely tiny) anisotropie...

It’s a recurrent experience that never fails to perplex me: Random people will seek my advice on questions of religion. Rather than posing queries about how the cosmos works, they want me to enlighten them on why.

Bottom line: We were so ordinary as to be thoroughly invisible — as would be any other worlds, together with their flora and fauna.

So while it may be disappointing, I have to confess to people who ask for my insights on the meaning of it all that astronomy doesn’t provide any clearly useful data on matters of sin and souls.

But it does offer some humbling insight into the scale of the problem. It is said that God has infinite abilities to observe, monitor, and influence. An appreciation for the breathtaking banality of our circumstances suggests just how audacious this idea is.

via What Astronomy Says About Religion | Seth Shostak.

I can’t recall ever seeing Seth Shostak weigh in on religion before, and of course this seems like almost a non-weigh in.

It reminds me of an article I was reading in the late 90s on dark matter and the recently discovered dark energy.  (I think it was in Time Magazine, but I’m not sure.)  It was an article that summarized known cosmology at that point, and I remembered how inconsequential our society and history felt in relation to that deep time and cosmological enormity.

I had known about the scale of the size and age of the cosmos decades earlier, but for some reason it had never really connected with me viscerally until that moment.  I thought about God and the faith I was raised in, and the way it had usually been presented suddenly seemed small and parochial in relation to what I had just read.

I was still nominally a believer at the time, and actually for years afterward, but looking back it seems like a milestone event.  Of course, many believers have had that same feeling and had it strengthen their faith.  To a large degree, I can understand why.  Maybe if my life history and circumstances had been different it might have for me, but it actually pushed me in the other direction.

This entry was posted in Zeitgeist and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What Astronomy Says About Religion | Seth Shostak

  1. Steve Morris says:

    Yup, space is big. And we are unbelievably small and insignificant and seemingly distant from the centre of things, Of course there is no centre, so everywhere is nowhere, or perhaps here is everywhere. And yet, … aren’t we completely different from the swarms of dark matter, suns and random debris that makes up the other 99.99999999999999999999% of the universe? Aren’t we unique and special? Could it be that the entire universe exists just to have created us? Or if there is no purpose, how can that make any sense for everything has purpose?

    What I am rambling about is that astronomy can tell us anything and nothing. It can confirm our belief in God or tip us into atheism. I guess that’s Seth’s point. Sorry for taking up space on your blog!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Great quote, thanks for you sharing. This view actually gives a really solid baseline to non-anthropocentric ethics (deep ecology).

    Liked by 1 person

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s