Mouse-over text: “People often say that same-sex marriage now is like interracial marriage in the 60s. But in terms of public opinion, same-sex marriage now is like interracial marriage in the 90s, when it had already been legal nationwide for 30 years.”
Interesting. Popular approval of interracial marriage lagged the legal situation, but popular approval of same-sex marriage preceded the legal situation.
From this I conclude that neither is cause nor effect. But what then?
I wondered the same thing. It does seem like popular approval of same-sex marriage is causing legal approval, but that legal approval of interracial marriage didn’t lead to popular approval. (Or if it did, it took a generation.)
My takeaway, is that popular approval is the magic sauce. (Admittedly, not exactly counter-intuitive.)
Mouse-over text: “People often say that same-sex marriage now is like interracial marriage in the 60s. But in terms of public opinion, same-sex marriage now is like interracial marriage in the 90s, when it had already been legal nationwide for 30 years.”
LikeLike
Thanks. I probably should have included that in the post.
LikeLike
Interesting. Popular approval of interracial marriage lagged the legal situation, but popular approval of same-sex marriage preceded the legal situation.
From this I conclude that neither is cause nor effect. But what then?
LikeLike
I wondered the same thing. It does seem like popular approval of same-sex marriage is causing legal approval, but that legal approval of interracial marriage didn’t lead to popular approval. (Or if it did, it took a generation.)
My takeaway, is that popular approval is the magic sauce. (Admittedly, not exactly counter-intuitive.)
LikeLike