What’s the largest number we can really comprehend? It’s smaller than you think

This guy is awesome!

I think I’ve mentioned before that we don’t really understand the very large and very small, we just equate it with metaphors of our “normal” scale existence.  Nick Lucid gives one of the reasons why.  Without abstract frameworks, we can’t really do numbers.

BTW, he has a Tumblr site.

This entry was posted in Zeitgeist and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What’s the largest number we can really comprehend? It’s smaller than you think

  1. Steve Morris says:

    I’m not sure he proves his case. I have heard before that the human brain can only remember 5 objects at a time. We think we can remember more, but that’s because we group items.

    But does that mean we cannot understand numbers bigger than 5?

    Flashing dots on the screen for short times doesn’t prove we can’t understand numbers, only that we need time to count.

    Like

  2. James Pailly says:

    I’ve noticed I usually count in groups of either three or five. I can’t do anything more elaborate than that without using my finger to point at items as I count them. It’s good to know I’m not the only one limited in that way.

    Like

  3. In college, I heard that the US military did some tests decades ago and concluded that our minds can only hold 5-7 things at a time. I suspect without the grouping he shows in that video, we can only think in magnitudes after that. From that standpoint, mathematics is a major accomplishment.

    Like

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s